As you have probably heard, the Canadian Real Estate Association (CREA) approved changes to the rules governing the use of its Multiple Listing Service and the ability to pay for a la carte services such as a flat fee "listing only" service (akin to For-Sale-By-Owner FSBO). Others have commented on the changes. CBC's The Current ran a piece on November 3rd talking to a Calgarian owner, Bernadette Lonnegan who has tried to sell her property since May, first through an FSBO service, then through a Realtor on MLS offering a "listing only" service.
Ms. Lonnegan, however, has had little luck in selling her property. Her ability to list on MLS produced more traffic but, as it turns out, it also produced a lot of "undesirable" traffic in the form of (likely) scam artists, and, perhaps, anaemic traffic from buying agents at established firms. The overhead in selling a large capital asset, for her, even given she had free time to handle the listing, has turned out to be significant. Herein lies one of the many issues with FSBO in general.
Certainly Realtors have been given a hard time on local real estate blogs, from being called "realtards," shills, used-car salesmen (ouch...), to the more poignant criticisms of the real estate sales industry in general surrounding: the commission structure, obfuscation of previous sales data (which is public through land title offices), conflict of interest when acting as a buyer agent, etc. In the case of poor Bernadette, it turns out selling an expensive capital asset has proven to be difficult. She goes as far to state she thought going FSBO was not worth her time and effort and, doing it again, would have used a Realtor.
The CREA's move to allow access to MLS to FSBO certainly provides a need to a segment of potential home sellers. It should not be underestimated, however, how difficult the sales process for a multi-hundred-thousand dollar capital asset can be. For those who regularly sell in such an environment or simply have confidence they know the sales process, FSBO is a viable choice. But for the overwhelming majority of homeowners this is unlikely the case. Even with FSBO, there is still a chance a buyer agent will want a commission regardless.
What The Current's interview showed me is that, while opening MLS to FSBOs is welcome in principle, it is unlikely to have a significant effect on the marketplace. That the overwhelming majority of Realtors voted to accept these changes is an indication of this.
The next likely step in overhauling MLS will come in the form of opening up the previous sales data to the public, as has been done in the US for several years now. Companies like Google or Redfin, with their various technological innovations, are effectively kept out of the marketplace. Certainly another method of "opening" up the previous sales data could come in the form of changes to the land title offices' distribution of bulk sales data to large companies for a fee. In sum, depending upon what data are provided, it could produce more revenue for them than would the piecemeal requests they receive today.
A big question, as with FSBO, is will access to previous sales data help make the market more efficient? As much as I would like to think so, experience in the US showed that even with unfettered access to sales and mortgage data, many areas of the country saw significant price run-ups regardless. As a value investor looking to buy property, I would not care too much (though not at all) about previous sales data. The price paid is based upon value -- net operating income and development potential -- not what other people are currently paying. As a seller I would care quite a bit about previous sales data, though in theory even if going through a listing-only service, such a service should be able to provide sales data for little extra charge. Nonetheless, in principle, having previous sales data would be a welcome change towards a more open marketplace.
Thursday, November 04, 2010
Wednesday, October 27, 2010
Teranet House Price Index - August 2010
OCTOBER 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
For a second consecutive month, prices did not rise from the month before in all six markets. The Calgary index was down 0.5% from June and the Vancouver index 0.4%. For Vancouver it was the second monthly decline in a row. In Toronto the monthly rise was 0.4%, the smallest in five months. In Montreal it was 0.5%, in Halifax 0.9% and in Ottawa 1.4%. For the composite index as a whole the monthly increase in August was 0.2%, the smallest since the index began climbing 16 months ago. The uninterrupted string of 16 monthly gains exceeds the 14-month run of August 2005 through September 2006. Teranet – National Bank House Price Index™The historical data of the Teranet – National Bank House Price Index™ is available at www.housepriceindex.ca.
The Teranet–National Bank House Price Index™ is estimated by tracking observed or registered home prices over time using data collected from public land registries. All dwellings that have been sold at least twice are considered in the calculation of the index. This is known as the repeat sales method; a complete description of the method is given at www.housepriceindex.ca
Teranet - National Bank House Price Index™ thanks the author for their special collaboration on this report. 1 Value of Dwelling for the Owner-occupied Non-farm, Non-reserve Private Dwellings of Canada. |
Monday, October 25, 2010
Tuesday, October 19, 2010
Yawn!
To be blunt, I'm bored with following the real estate market.
It moves terribly slow and the human emotions involved are heated, to say the least, and can be largely irrational. This is frustrating so I've been taking a break.
During this break, I haven't been missing anything so I've concluded that it isn't worth very much effort or time for me to involve myself too much in this blog anymore. It was interesting and I still certainly hold my conclusion that real estate in the Vancouver area is grossly overpriced considering the rental yield.
Additionally, I have been enjoying being a dad to my two little boys and my work has been exceptionally busy so I just don't find I have the time to devote to doing a good job on the analysis part of the blog. There are others who have picked up the mantle of providing monthly charts and statistics so I feel my work in that respect is largely irrelavent.
Anyway, I'm not shutting the blog down. I'll be around and I still plan on posting interesting articles or videos that I stumble across. I just thought it was fair to post how I've been feeling lately.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)